DOCTORAL COURSE UNIT DESCRIPTION
Course unit title |
Scientific direction Scientific code |
Faculty |
Department (s) |
|
Zoological Systematics |
Zoology N 014 |
Nature Research Center Life Sciences Center |
Institute of Ecology Institute of Biosciences |
|
Mode of studies |
Number of credits |
Mode of studies |
Number of credits |
|
Lectures |
0 |
Consultations |
2 |
|
Self-studies |
8 |
Seminars |
0 |
|
Aims of course |
To deepen the understanding and competence concerning basic principles and methods of Zoological Systematics |
||
Main topics |
Systematics as an unifying biological subject. Systematics, taxonomy and classification. Systematic categories. Species as a hierarchical system. Structural - functional and taxonomic intraspecific units. Supraspecific taxonomic categories. Functional and taxonomic meaning of higher taxa. Phenetic (digital) systematics. Cladistic (phylogenetic) systematics. Evolutionary systematics. Practical phylogenetics. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZM). |
||
Main literature |
|||
Schuh R. T., Brower A. V. Z. 2009. Biological systematics: principles and applications. Ithaca: Cornell University Press |
|||
Forey P. L., Humpphries Ch. J., Kitching I. J., Scotland R. W., Siebert D. J., Williams D. M., 2002. Cladistics: A Practical Course in Systematics. Oxford. |
|||
Wheeler W.A., 2012. Systematics: a course of lectures. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. |
|||
Wiley, Edward O. and Bruce S. Lieberman. 2011. Phylogenetics: Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=international+code+of+zoological+nomenclature Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14390469 Journal of Systematics and Evolution https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17596831 |
|||
Assessment strategy |
Assessment criteria |
||
Seminar presentation, etc. |
The scientific problem discussed during the seminar presentation based on taxonomic methodology (30 minutes). 10 (excellent). The presentation meets the requirements to scientific works. The conclusions are supported by the data presented. 9 (very good). One of the disadvantages listed below was observed during the seminar presentation. 8 (good). Two disadvantages were observed. 7 (highly satisfactory). Three disadvantages were observed. 6 (satisfactory). Four disadvantages were observed. 5 (sufficient). Five disadvantages were observed. 4 (insufficient). All disadvantages listed below were observed during the seminar presentation. The disadvantages observed during the seminar presentation: the analysis of literature was incomplete; the goals and tasks of the presentation were not clear; the conclusions were not supported by the data presented; the questions during the seminar were not answered or were answered incorrectly; the presentation did not meet the requirements to the scientific works; the essential concepts were used incorrectly. |
||
Coordinator(s): Name, surname |
Scientic degree |
Pedagogical rank |
|
Gediminas Valkiūnas |
Habil. Dr. |
||
Rimantas Rakauskas |
Habil. Dr. |
Prof. |
Approved by the Council of Graduate School of Life Sciences Center No 600000-…-… on the …. of …… 2021 |
Chairman |