Course unit title |
Scientific direction Scientific code |
Faculty |
Department (s) |
|
Environmental Microbiology |
Biology N 004 |
Life Sciences Centre |
Institute of Biosciences |
|
Total number of credits | 10 | |||
Mode of studies |
Number of credits |
Mode of studies |
Number of credits |
|
Lectures |
0 |
Consultations |
3 |
|
Self-studies |
7 |
Seminars |
0 |
Aims of the course |
The course is designed to introduce the impact of microorganisms on global metabolic cycles, alternative energy sources, bioremediation and biodegradation; to present traditional and new molecular approaches in microbiology that are strategically applied to address problems in environmental microbiology. The course is intended to provide an understanding of the environmental challenges and the decisions that need to be made to strike a balance between environmental conservation and human well-being. |
|
Main topics |
|
|
Main literature |
||
|
||
Assessment strategy |
Assessment criteria |
|
The oral examination |
For the report, the PhD student prepares a 30-40 minute presentation detailing the topic analysed; the latest research in the field; and the problems and strategies to address the issues raised. The presentation should be based on publications from the last 5 years. Assessment: 10: Excellent knowledge and skills. The presentation is comprehensive and detailed; the presenter is able to discuss the topic and analyse the issues well. 9: Very good knowledge and skills. The presentation is comprehensive and detailed; the speaker is not always able to discuss the topic presented and analyse the issues. 8: Good knowledge and skills. The presentation contains minor errors; the presenter is not always able to discuss the topic presented and analyse the issues. 7: Moderate knowledge and skills. The presentation contains substantial errors; the presenter is not always able to discuss the topic presented and analyse the issues. 6: Satisfactory knowledge and skills. The presentation is full of fundamental errors; the speaker is not always able to discuss the topic presented and analyse the issues. 5: Weak knowledge and skills that still meet the minimum requirements. The presentation is full of errors; the speaker's ability to discuss the topic presented and analyse the issues is weak. 0-4: The minimum requirements are not met. |
Coordinator(s) Name, Surname |
Scientific degree |
|
Alisa Gricajeva Audrius Gegeckas Renata Gudiukaitė |
dr. dr. dr. |
Approved by the Council of Doctoral School of Life Sciences Center No (4.10)600000-KT-… on the 14th of October 2023 |
Chairperson dr. Daiva Baltriukienė |